Skip to content
Posts
- SCP Regulations: DTSC’s Informational Candidate Chemicals List May Not Be As Informational As You Think….
- When Worlds Collide — What Happens When Non-California Consumers See A Prop 65 Warning
- Proposition 65 Plaintiffs Off to Another High Volume Year of Enforcement
- Another TSCA Modernization Bill?
- OEHHA Proposes Overhaul of Prop 65 Warning Regulations — But Will It Help or Hurt?
- The Lottery No One Wants to Win: The Rigid Plastic Packaging Container Act Compliance Certification Is Coming
- It’s Finally Here — DTSC’s Draft Priority Products List
- EPA Issues Guidance on Web-Distributed Labeling for Pesticides
- Texas Lawsuit Highlights Tension Between Agency Transparency and Protection of CBI
- Vermont Senate Passes Toxics in Consumer Products Bill
- Attorneys General for 13 States Voice Objection to Chemicals in Commerce Act
- Vermont House Approves Amended Toxics in Consumer Products Bill
- California Genetically Engineered Food Labeling Bill Resurrects Proposition 37
- Biomonitoring California Publishes Chemical Exposure Results
- California Attorney General Issues Report on 2013 Proposition 65 Enforcement Activity
- Minnesota Bans Triclosan in Consumer Antiseptic Products
- Over 130 Trade Organizations and Companies Oppose OEHHA’s Draft Prop 65 Warning Regulations
- EPA Promises To Issue New CBI Rule Under TSCA
- SEC Issues New Guidance on Conflict Mineral Rule, But Rule’s Future Is Unclear
- Apparel and Footwear Industry’s Manufacturing Restricted Substances List Will Pose Supply Chain Challenges
- DTSC May Release Draft Priority Product Work Plan As Soon As July 15
- EPA Publishes SNURs for Thirteen Substances Including Two Carbon Nanotubes
- DTSC Schedules Priority Product Work Plan Workshops in August 2014
- Safer Consumer Products Regulations — Update
- OEHHA Continues To Consider Revisions to Prop 65 Warning Regulations
- EPA Enforcement Actions on Nanosilver-Containing Consumer Products Highlight Need To Be Careful About Marketing Claims
- ECHA Considers 22 Chemicals for Inclusion in REACH Authorisation List
- DTSC Releases Draft Priority Products Work Plan
- OEHHA Solicits Public Input on Possible Revisions to Proposition 65 Regulations
- OEHHA Tries Again with Revisions to Prop 65 Warning Regulations
- DTSC Priority Product Work Plan Workshop Reveals Agency’s Next Steps
- EPA Adds Nonylphenol Category to EPCRA List of Chemicals
- DTSC Extends Comment Period for Draft Priority Product Work Plan – And Other Safer Consumer Products Regulations Updates
- Maine Sets Deadline for Reporting Under Toxics in Children’s Products Law
- Will California S.B. 1019 Cause Confusion For Proposition 65 Compliance? – Yes.
- EPA Proposes Standards for Discharges of Dental Amalgam
- Proposition 65 Warning Requirement for DINP Becomes Effective Next Month
- DTSC Receives Federal Grant to Develop Alternatives Assessment Guidance
- OEHHA Data Call-In for Diaminotoluenes Reveals Increased Scrutiny of Proposition 65 Listings
- OEHHA Releases Proposed Revisions to Warning Regulations
- BPA Back on Proposition 65 List?
- Flurry of Proposition 65 Activity for DINP
- CPSC Publishes Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Phthalates in Children’s Products
- Lawsuit Against OEHHA Seeks Prop 65 Zero Threshold for Lead
- FDA Seeks Comment on UN Recommendations for Restrictions on A Widely Used Industrial Chemical
- EPA Proposes SNUR for Toluene Diisocyanate
- EPA Proposes SNUR for Long-Chain Perfluroalkyl Carboxylate and PFAS Substances
- New Proposition 65 Bill Introduced
- OSHA Issues Enforcement Guidance On New GHS Hazard Communication Requirements For Mixtures
- Third Time’s A Charm? – OEHHA Proposes To List Styrene
- OEHHA Holding Public Hearing on Proposed Prop 65 Warning Regulations and Website
- BPA Being Considered for Listing as Proposition 65 Female Reproductive Toxicant
- Appellate Court Opinion Clarifies Key Aspects of Proposition 65 Exposure Assessments
- BPA Listed As Proposition 65 Female Reproductive Toxicant
- DTSC Releases Final Priority Product Work Plan
- EPA Proposes TSCA Section 8(a) Reporting Rule for Nanoscale Materials
- OSHA Issues Second Enforcement Guidance Document on 2012 HCS
- Flame Retardants Still On the Hot Seat
- EU Supports Restrictions on BPA in Thermal Paper
- Controversy Over PFAS and PFOA Chemicals Continue
- Progress in TSCA Modernization
- OEHHA Lists Ethylene Glycol As A Proposition 65 Reproductive Toxicant
- OEHHA Proposes Significant Changes in Proposition 65 Lead MADL and in Rules for Evaluating Proposition 65 Exposures
- Successful Defense in Proposition 65 Titanium Dioxide Lawsuit
- OEHHA Revises Proposition 65 Website Proposal
- Belgium Issues Guidance on Nanomaterial Registration
- Senate TSCA Reform Bill Still On Track for Senate Floor Vote
- European Court of Justice Interprets REACH Duties for Articles Containing SHVCs
- DTSC Releases SCP Regulations Draft Alternatives Analysis Guidance Document
- California Attorney General Proposes New Proposition 65 Settlement Regulations
- DTSC Proposes To Update Candidate Chemicals List Under Safer Consumer Products Regulations
- Wells Fargo Offers Proposition 65 Insurance
- OEHHA Releases New Proposition 65 Warning Proposal
- California Passes Microbeads Ban – But It May Become Preempted
- OEHHA Issues Safe Use Determination for DINP in Roofing Membrane Products
- Senate Passes TSCA Reform Bill
- Washington Proposes to Amend PBT Criteria in Chemical Action Plans
- President Obama Signs Federal Microbeads Ban Into Law
- OEHHA Adopts Proposition 65 Website Regulation
- State Attorneys General Push for Limited Preemption in TSCA Reform
- California Ingredient Disclosure Bill Fails
- EPA Announces Electronic Portal for Submission of Self-Disclosures
- FDA Revokes Approval of Three Perfluoroalkyl Ethyl Containing Food-Contact Substances
- Attorney General Releases Revised Prop 65 Settlement Guidelines for Public Comment
- OEHHA Adopts No Significant Risk Level for DINP
- NIOSH Releases External Review Draft of Current Intelligence Bulletin – Health Effects of Occupational Exposures to Silver Nanomaterials
- ASTM Publishes Green Chemistry Standard
- OEHHA Proposes Proposition 65 Safe Harbor Warning and MADL for BPA Just In Time for Effective Date of BPA Warning Requirement
- OEHHA Considers PFOS and PFOA for Possible Listing under Proposition 65
- District of Columbia Joins Other States in Banning Flame Retardants
- Public Comment Period Begins on OEHHA’s Revised Prop 65 BPA Emergency Regulations
- OEHHA Proposes Proposition 65 Warning Level for Ethylene Glycol
- OEHHA Adopts Emergency Regulations for BPA Warnings
- OEHHA Adds Styrene to the Proposition 65 List and Proposes NSRL
- OEHHA Releases Revised Proposition 65 Warning Proposal
- New York State Assembly Passes Proposition 65-Like Law for Children’s Products
- TSCA Amendments Move Forward
- Get Ready for CDR
- H.R. 5205 Would Require Disclosure of Cleaning Product Ingredients
- OEHHA Issues Safe Use Determination for DINP in Tandus Centiva ER3 Modular Vinyl Carpet Tile
- BPA Maximum Acceptable Dose Level Is Finalized – But Not Quite In Time For New BPA Claims
- FDA Scrutinizes Phthalates — And Sours on Evaporated Cane Juice
- President Obama Signs TSCA Amendments into Law
- EPA Releases Lautenberg First Year Implementation Plan
- Proposition 65 Notices of Violation Issued for BPA
- California Air Resources Board’s 2015 Data Reporting for the Consumer Products Program Begins
- DTSC Begins Rulemaking on First Priority Products List under Safer Consumer Products Regulations
- Brace Yourself: OEHHA Adopts New Proposition 65 Warning Regulations
- California Attorney General Adopts New Proposition 65 Settlement Regulations and Guidelines
- DTSC Requests Input on Possible Future Priority Products under Safer Consumer Products Regulations
- Brace Yourself (Part 2): How Will The New Proposition 65 Warning Regulations Affect Settlements?
- OEHHA’S BPA Database Is Up and Running After New Prop 65 BPA Warning Regulation Adopted
- EPA Proposes TSCA Inventory Reset Rule
- New California Consumer Product and Aerosol Coating Product Requirements Effective as of January 1st, 2017
- OEHHA’s “Non-Substantive” Revisions to New Safe Harbor Warnings May Not Be So Non-Substantive…
- DTSC Releases Draft AA Guidance under SCP Program
- President Trump Issues “One In, Two Out” Executive Order Affecting Federal Rulemakings
- New Target Chemical Policy Continues Retailer Regulation Trend
- Washington State Flame Retardant Ban Begins July 1, 2017
- EPA Freezes Implementation of TSCA CBI Substantiation Interpretation
- California Senate Introduces Cleaning Product Ingredient Disclosure Bill
- California Company Faces TSCA Criminal Charges
- DTSC Proposes New Priority Product: Spray Polyurethane Foam Systems with Unreacted MDIs
- Washington State Department of Ecology Proposes Children’s Safe Products Act Regulations
- EPA Hosts Meetings on TSCA and EPCRA Regulatory Reform Pursuant to Executive Order 13777
- California Senate Bill 49 Moves To Judiciary Committee
- OEHHA Finalizes Ethylene Glycol Maximum Acceptable Dose Level
- OEHHA Publishes Translations of New Proposition 65 Safe Harbor Warnings
- OEHHA Proposes No Significant Risk Level for Glyphosate
- Public Comment on Safer Consumer Products Priority Product Proposal Extended to June 6, 2017
- OEHHA Extends Public Comment Period for Glyphosate NSRL
- LifeScienceRisk to Offer Proposition 65 Insurance Coverage for Herbal Product and Dietary Supplement Industry
- Proposition 65 Notices Target Cannabis
- OEHHA To Hold Public Hearing on Lead in Candy
- Senate Committee Approves S. 951, The Regulatory Accountability Act
- OEHHA Proposes Amendment to Proposition 65 Notice Regulations
- Proposition 65 Amendment AB 1583 Referred to California Senate Judiciary Committee
- OEHHA Provides Guidance on Safe Harbor Warnings for Lead Under New Regulations
- AB 1583 Passes Senate and Assembly – But Will It Promote Transparency in Proposition 65 Private Enforcement?
- Should Your Proposition 65 Consent Judgment Be Modified?
- Governor Brown Vetoes Butane Bill
- Proposition 65 Settlement May Establish New Industry Standard for Lead and Cadmium in Chocolate
- Warning for the New California Adult Use Marijuana Industry: Doing Business in California Can Expose You to Proposition 65 Enforcement Actions
- 2017 Ends with Flurry of Proposition 65 Activity
- OEHHA Releases Guidance on Proposition 65 Safe Harbor Warnings
- Will Coffee Require Cancer Warnings in California? – And Other Proposition 65 Developments
- DTSC Releases Draft 2018-2020 Priority Product Workplan under the Safer Consumer Product Program
- Update on Private Proposition 65 Enforcement
- DTSC Releases Product – Chemical Profile for Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) in Carpets and Rugs
- Could OEHHA Add Processed Meats to Proposition 65 List?
- Federal Judge Prohibits Enforcement of Proposition 65 Warning Requirement for Glyphosate – But The Devil Is in The Details
- Between A Rock and A Hard Place – Or, When Is A Proposition 65 Exempt Business Not Really Exempt?
- OEHHA Proposes Tailored Safe Harbor Warnings for Residential Rental Properties
- Court Rules That Wine Does Not Need Proposition 65 Warnings for Arsenic
- OEHHA Proposes Amendment to Proposition 65 Safe Harbor Warnings for Pesticides
- Proposition 65 Private Enforcement – Where The Numbers Are
- New Warnings for Acrylamide and How They Affect the Coffee Industry
- In Unprecedented Action, OEHHA Proposes Regulation Preventing Cancer Warnings for Coffee
- OEHHA Establishes No Significant Risk Level for Vinylidene Chloride
- New Prop 65 Warning Requirements: Are Hotels Prepared for Changes?
- The Process for Adding Chemicals to the Prop 65 List
- The Status of BPA Notifications for Food and Drink Companies
- Beware Those Ready-Made Proposition 65 Warning Signs and Stickers
- Complying with New Prop 65 Regulations for Online Purchases
- Nanomaterial Reporting Deadline Looms – And May Trigger Changes Down The Road for Nanoscale Substances Under TSCA
- Evaluating the Effects of Prop 65: Do They Actually Help or Hurt Consumers?
- Enforcement and Penalties for Prop 65 Violations – Ouch
- How Prop 65 Regulatory Amendments May Affect the Food Industry
- California Court Determines that Breakfast Cereals Don’t Require Prop 65 Warnings
- Getting to the Bottom of the Coffee Debate: Is it Safe to Drink?
- Court Affirms Lead Limits Under Proposition 65
- The Struggle Between Suppliers and Retailers Over Responsibility to Issue Warnings
- Prop 65 Plaintiffs May Be Permitted to Request Jury Trials
- No Warnings Required for Monsanto Herbicide as a Result of Conflicting Evidence
- What Do Prop 65 Labels on Products Really Mean?
- The Soda Industry Faces Changes to Prop 65
- Compliance for Cannabis Dispensaries Under Prop 65 Amendments
- Safe Use Determination: What is it and Who Can Request it?
- Conflicts Between Prop 65 and Federal Law: Can Prop 65 be Preempted?
- Understanding Exposure Levels Under Prop 65
- Glyphosate Detected in Popular Breakfast Cereals
- What are My Defenses in a Prop 65 Lawsuit?
- California Passes Professional Cosmetics Labeling Law
- OEHHA’s Safe Use Determination for Styrene in Bath Products
- Bayer to Appeal Verdict in Glyphosate Case
- Will New Regulations Lead to More Lawsuits?
- Prop 65 Requirements for Residential Properties: What You Need to Know
- FDA Takes a Stand in Coffee Controversy
- Popular Vaping Products Increasingly Subject to Prop 65 Litigation
- Evaluating the Procedures for a Private Enforcement Action
- NIOSH Releases Revised Draft Bulletin on Silver Nanomaterials
- EPA Issues Final Fees Rule Under the Toxic Substances Control Act
- Follow Up to Release of Final Rule on TSCA User Fees: Identifying Manufacturers Subject to Fees
- Retail Company Halts Sales Due to Prop 65 Warnings
- TSCA Fees Set to Increase
- OEHHA Announces Proposal for Determining Reproductive Toxicants in Food Products
- When Do Aloe Vera Products Require Warnings?
- House Bill Proposes Banning Ingredients and Providing Disclosure for Personal Care Products
- New Report Concludes BPA Is Safe
- EPA Proposes Procedures for Identifying Chemicals to Prioritize for Risk Evaluations
- Evaluating the Risks of Pesticides and Herbicide Exposure in Cannabis
- American Chemistry Council Opposes Designation of Polyurethane As A Priority Product
- California Heavy Metals Testing for Cannabis May Usher New Prop 65 Claims
- EPA Delays Proposal Prohibiting Use of Studies that Withhold Data
- FDA Plans to Ban Lead Acetate in Hair Dye
- OEHHA Issues Notice of Intent for Cancer Drug
- New Chemicals Program Under TSCA Faces Criticism
- Manufacturers of Talc Products May Face Liability Under Prop 65
- Prop 65 Regulations Target PFAS
- EPA Notified of Lawsuit Over Failure to Ban Methylene Chloride in Paint Strippers
- California Adds Nickel to Prop 65 List As A Reproductive Toxicant
- California Department of Pesticide Regulation Recommends Temporary Restrictions on Chlorpyrifos
- OEHHA Intends to List PCBTF as Proposition 65 Carcinogen
- Clarifying Amendments Proposed for Sellers Under Proposition 65
- OEHHA Proposes Clarifications to the Definition of “Actual Knowledge”
- Amazon Bans Lethal Paint Strippers
- EPA Withdraws Last of Direct Final Rules
- Congress Evaluates Bill to Amend EPA’s Integrated Risk Information System Program
- OEHHA Examines the Use of Short Form Warnings
- Changes in Chemical Legislation Likely to Occur After Midterm Elections
- The Process of Listing Chemical by State’s Qualified Experts
- EPA Denies TSCA Petition for Asbestos Reporting
- OEHHA Withdraws Proposed Prop 65 Exemption for Carcinogens in Coffee
- States Considering More Chemical Regulations by Class
- California Confirms Sleep Products Comply with Safer Consumer Products Regulations
- EPA’s 2019 Civil Penalties for Violations
- California Air Resources Board Amends Consumer Products Regulation
- OEHHA Proposes Clear and Reasonable Warnings for Rental Cars
- California Repeals Flammability Standard for Furniture Used in Public Spaces
- EPA Announces Update of TSCA Chemical Inventory
- Federal Government Halts Regulation of Toxic Chemicals
- EPA Considers Stricter Regulation of PFAS Regulation
- OEHHA Takes First Step To List Cannabis Related Substances As Reproductive Toxicants
- California Air Resources Board to Initiate Rulemaking for Reducing Emissions from Consumer Products
- California Proposes Designation of Nail Products Containing Toluene as a Priority Product
- California Environmental Contaminant Biomonitoring Program Revises List of Designated Chemicals
- State Considering New Legislation to Expand Oversight of “Harmful” Cosmetics
- Increase in Notices of Prop 65 Violations for Online Web Sales
- EPA Releases Studies on PV29
- American Chemistry Council Reviews EPA Role in TSCA Implementation
- EPA Announces Priority Designations for Chemicals
- Understanding EPA’s Prioritization Process
- OEHHA Revises its Proposed Regulation on Cancer Warnings for Coffee
- FDA to Hold Public Hearing on Cannabis
- Los Angeles County Bans Use of Glyphosate Amid Verdict Against Monsanto
- OEHHA Releases Styrene Fact Sheet
- Prop 65 Provides Guidance for Rental Properties
- Government Accountability Office Assesses Implementation of TSCA
- Prop 65 May Have Led to Decreased Amounts of Lead in Candies
- EPA Issues Final TSCA Section 6(a) Rule on Methylene Chloride
- EPA Partners with Organizations to Address Animal Testing in Compliance with TSCA
- Virginia Restricts PFAS in Firefighting Foam
- EPA Alerts Public That Data About Toxic Chemicals May Be Erroneous
- Will Possible Listing of THC and Cannabis Stigmatize California’s New Cannabis Industry?
- TSCA Imposes Labeling Requirements for Composite Wood Products
- EPA Releases Proposal for Reviewing Certain Confidential Business Information under TSCA
- NGOs Propose Moratorium on New PFAS
- OEHHA Publishes Definition of Nickel
- Studies Find that Thousands of Cancer Cases May Be Linked to California Tap Water
- OEHHA Finalizes Proposition 65 Warning Exemption for Coffee
- OEHHA Modifies Proposal on Averaging Concentrations of Reproductive Toxicants in Foods
- Judicial Deference to Agencies under Auer and Chevron – Alive, But Not Kicking
- OEHHA Adds PCBTF Solvent to Proposition 65 List
- Canada Proposes Standards for Formaldehyde Emissions from Composite Wood Products
- USEPA Gets The Lead Out
- OEHHA Finalizes Safe Harbor Warning Regulations for Rental Vehicles
- OEHHA Publishes Fact Sheet on Chloroprene
- The Glyphosate Debate: EPA Takes Aim At Proposition 65
- Are We Seeing The Beginning of Proposition 65 “Bad Warning” Claims?
- Governor Approves Proposition 65 Amendment
- EPA Announces Receipt of Pesticide Applications for Hemp
- EPA Proposes High Priority Substances under TSCA
- Different Stroke for Different Agencies: What’s The Latest With 1,4-Dioxane?
- The First California Preliminary Alternatives Assessment Report Under The SCP Regulation Gets The First Notice of Deficiency
- Not So Fast…The FTC Issues Warning Letters to CBD Companies
- OEHHA Schedules DARTIC Meeting on Cannabis
- The Circular Economy: What It May Mean For Your Business
- Nicotine Vape Products: A Safer Alternative?
- New York Court Invalidates Cleaning Product Ingredient Disclosure Requirements
- Illinois Bans BPA-Containing Receipt Paper
- Take Two and Call Me In the Morning: OEHHA Publishes Proposition 65 Hazard Identification Document for Acetominophen
- OEHHA Publishes Hazard Identification Document for Marijuana Smoke and THC
- DTSC Announces SCP Program Webinar on Food Packaging Evaluation
- American Chemistry Council Challenges Priority Product Designation of SPF Systems
- Are Proposition 65 Warnings Affecting Consumer Perceptions of Product Safety?
- OEHHA Proposes NSRL and Publishes Draft Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk Factor Document for PCBTF
- DTSC Schedules Another Public Meeting on Food Packaging
- Attorney General Files Motion To Dismiss Federal Proposition 65 Acrylamide Warning Challenge
- EPA’s Draft Risk Evaluation for Methylene Chloride Sets The Stage for Potential Regulation – And Controversy
- Another Retailer Issues Chemical Policy
- OEHHA Postpones Meeting on Listing Acetaminophen as Proposition 65 Carcinogen
- DTSC Schedules Public Meeting on PFAS
- New Proposition 65 Chemical Listings May Affect The Cannabis and The CBD Industries
- OEHHA Issues Interpretive Guideline for Residential Exposure to Dichlorvos
- EPA Increases Maximum Civil Penalties
- 7 Things You Should Do If You Receive A Proposition 65 Notice of Violation
- The (Possibly) Short Life of the Proposition 65 Short Form Warning
- OEHHA Proposes Revisions to Proposition 65 Short Form Warning Amendments
- California Appellate Court Opinion Answers Longstanding Questions – And Further Incentivizes Warnings
- OEHHA Dials Back Short Form Warning Proposal
- Ninth Circuit Upholds Preliminary Injunction in Prop 65 Acrylamide Challenge – But It’s Not Over Yet
- Coffee Defendants Victorious in Proposition 65 Appeal
- New EPA PFAS Reporting Rule Imposes Significant Burdens on Consumer Product Importers
